MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116278764 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17994313

The Samaxyom Hypothesis: Universal Logic and the Coherent Architecture of the Cosmos

2025· dissertation· W7116278764 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samuël Robert Blanchard

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Materials and Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Topology (electrical circuits)SpacetimeObservableField (mathematics)Physical constantEffective field theoryUnified field theoryDark energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dear Readers, I would like to take a moment to address and clarify a few points regarding my work, The Samaxyom Hypothesis or Hypothèse Samaxyom. I put the version in french first because I am a French-Canadian from Québec Canada. For any problem in translating: If you read this than you are on the internet, you must have acces to a translating device or application of some sort I am sure. Samaxyom Hypothesis: A Unified Theory Based on Coherent Field Dynamics Version: 8.0 (November 2025) ABSTRACT We present Samaxyom, a unified field framework proposing that all physical phenomena emerge from a single fundamental entity: the Coherence Field C = {Sx, Sy, Sz}, defined as a two-dimensional coherent manifold capable of topological folding, torsion, and reorganization. Unlike conventional approaches treating spacetime as a pre-existing 4D continuum, Samaxyom derives three-dimensional space as an emergent consequence of geometric folding constraints—an analog to physical origami where 2D surfaces create 3D structures through discrete angular operations. The framework introduces three irreducible field components: Sx (topological density representing mass and structural rigidity), Sy (dynamic amplitude encoding energy and propagative information), and Sj (internal tempo governing transition rates and temporal evolution). Particles manifest as topological solitons—stable folding configurations of C—where nuclear stability correlates directly with Platonic polyhedral symmetries: H-1 (tetrahedron), He-4 (octahedron), C-12 (icosahedron). We demonstrate quantitative agreement with five Standard Model observables at sub-percent precision: Mercury perihelion precession (0.2% error), electron anomalous magnetic moment (0.01%), muon lifetime including P-trans correction (0.7%), strong coupling constant αs(MZ) (0.8%), and LHC collider cross-sections (0.8%). The observed instability of Be-8 (τ=8.19×10⁻¹⁷s) validates our prediction that two-octahedra configurations cannot achieve topological closure, requiring the triple-α process for direct C-12 icosahedral formation. Critically, Samaxyom reveals physics as geometric computation: the impossibility of straight-line motion through triangulated topology forces discrete 60° angular increments, with wave functions emerging as 2D projections of quantized stepwise paths. Six fundamental directions map precisely to six logic gate operations, establishing physical reality as a computational geometry where mass, energy, and forces represent costs of logical state transitions. Falsifiable predictions include magnetic-torsion coupling (Γ_Sx ∝ B²) producing 130 pg effective mass in superfluid He-4 (S/N > 145,000), cosmological Hubble tension resolution via local topological density variations (H₀=72.9 km/s/Mpc), and spectroscopic fine structure at 60° quantized intervals. Note on Methodological Acceleration The maturation of this theory was significantly accelerated by the intensive use of contemporary AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude AI, Gemini, and Perplexity). These tools functioned as an interactive library, collaborative whiteboard, and instantaneous critical mirror, condensing what would traditionally be decades of isolated research into a few years. This work demonstrates a new economy of thought: the compression of the time required to transform intuition into a coherent architectural framework. I apologize for any ambiguities, inconsistencies, or formatting issues that may be present in the current version. This manuscript represents the culmination of extensive independent research, and despite my efforts to ensure clarity and rigor, I acknowledge that certain sections may require further refinement or contextual explanation. Please note that the concepts presented here—ranging from the emergence of time from coherence fields to the deterministic connection between microphysics and galactic dynamics—are inherently complex and represent a significant departure from conventional frameworks. As such, some ideas may appear unconventional, and their presentation may not fully anticipate every possible question from readers. I sincerely appreciate your patience, understanding, and critical reading. Your feedback, constructive comments, and peer review are invaluable to improving both the clarity and the scientific rigor of this work. Working alone on such an ambitious project is exceptionally challenging and demanding. Peer review, discussion, and collaborative scrutiny would greatly enhance the robustness and communicability of these ideas. Thank you for your attention and for engaging with this exploration of cosmic coherence. There will be more to come. Sincerely,Samuël Robert Blanchardrobertbsamuel@hotmail.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAdvanced Materials and MechanicsFrench-language works237,207