MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116338798 · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2025.116670

Real-time VOC profiling for controlling the Crabtree effect in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2025· article· en· W7116338798 on OpenAlexaff
Héctor Guillén-Alonso, Nancy Shyrley García‐Rojas, Robert Winkler, Francisco Villaseñor-Ortega

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrochemical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsBioreactorMass spectrometrySaccharomyces cerevisiaeYeastIn situTemporal resolutionEthanolSaturation (graph theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Crabtree effect enables ethanol production in aerobic environments with high glucose concentrations. This metabolic shift produces a characteristic VOCs profile. Its mechanism is not fully understood for different reasons, including differences in growing conditions, low temporal resolution monitoring, and loss of molecular information due to saturation or high selectivity. Using a portable mass spectrometer (MoBiMS) connected directly to a bioreactor headspace, we developed a method for continuous VOC monitoring that overcomes limitations of traditional techniques regarding specificity, saturation, and temporal resolution. This approach improves resolution from hours to seconds. We used these VOC profiles to train a model to classify metabolic states as Crabtree-positive or Crabtree-negative in seconds. Furthermore, signal processing of the kinetic data reveals stimulus timing and periodicity. Our findings demonstrate the viability of in situ online VOC monitoring in bioprocesses, enabling detection of Crabtree effect induction and analysis of metabolic responses to glucose addition stimuli.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrochemical JournalSame topicFungal and yeast genetics researchFrench-language works237,207