Bibliographic record
Abstract
Archimetis is a thinking space at the intersection of awareness, organization, and change. This contribution is its blueprint: a first load-bearing structure, intentionally open - an orientation rather than a finished doctrine. It starts from the assumption that organizations possess an inner architecture: spaces of perception, implicit expectations, atmospheres, and layers of meaning that precede what is formally visible. The text unfolds four perspectives as a constellation: Architecture of attention the perceptual space in which organization takes form, Metis - the intelligence of navigating change while it is still in motion, Unfinishedness as method - the posture of keeping attention open without becoming arbitrary, Organization of the soul - inner coherence, belonging, and sense-making. Publication note: This Zenodo record is the canonical, versioned reference (DOI). Web and serial editions may differ editorially from this reference version. Canonical Home: https://archimetis.de/en/thinkspace/working-papers/blueprint Tanslation note: This is an English translation of the German original (Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17963661) How to cite: When referencing Archimetis, please cite this Zenodo version (DOI). Reading trails (entry points) Perception first: Attention architecture → Unfinishedness Change in motion: Metis → Attention architecture Sense & belonging: Organization of the soul → Attention architecture When everything speeds up: Unfinishedness → Metis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.040 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.019 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".