RareLink: scalable REDCap-based framework for rare disease interoperability linking international registries to FHIR and Phenopackets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) is widely adopted in rare disease research, its unconstrained data format often lacks native interoperability with global health standards, limiting secondary use. We developed RareLink, an open-source framework implementing our published ontology-based rare disease common data model. It enables standardised data exchange between REDCap, international registries, and downstream analysis tools by linking Global Alliance for Genomics and Health Phenopackets and Health Level 7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) instances conforming to International Patient Summary and Genomics Reporting profiles. RareLink was developed in three phases across Germany, Canada, South Africa, and Japan for registry and data analysis purposes. We defined a simulated Kabuki syndrome cohort and demonstrated data export to Phenopackets and FHIR. RareLink can enhance the clinical utility of REDCap through its global applicability, supporting equitable rare disease research. Broader adoption and coordination with international entities are thus essential to realise its full potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".