Efficient and Secure Data Sharing With Mobile Crowdsensing in Internet of Vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Promoting data sharing is one of the critical strategies for thriving in the digital age, and enormous demand for location-based services propels data sharing in the Internet of Vehicles (IoV), particularly in the case of integrating mobile crowdsensing (MCS). However, data security and privacy concerns are increasingly posing serious challenges to the development of data sharing. Although a slew of works have been designed to achieve secure data sharing in IoV, they are inadequate for addressing the privacy issues identified in the data sharing model and often suffer from performance limitations. In this work, we propose an efficient and secure data sharing scheme under the MCS-integrated IoV. Specifically, motivated by the distributed point function (DPF), we design a double-output DPF and leverage it to construct a secure updating scheme that protects full privacy while ensuring high efficiency. Then, based on the XOR filter and a series of subtle transformations, we carefully design a secure spatial test protocol to determine whether a point falls within an arbitrary spatial range efficiently. Afterward, we propose a secure retrieving protocol by using the idea of shared shuffling, in which the offline sub-protocol is presented to generate random masks, and the online sub-protocol is designed to quickly retrieve the desired data items. After formally proving the security of our proposed schemes, we experimentally evaluate their efficiency by comparing them with the alternative solutions, and the results indicate that our proposed schemes offer superior performance, particularly in terms of communication overheads.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".