MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116437058 · doi:10.5287/ora-6qb9jezjj

Supernova neutrinos and measurement of liquid scintillator backgrounds in SNO+

2022· dissertation· en· W7116437058 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jia-Shian Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutrinoSupernovaScintillatorNeutrino detectorCosmic rayCoincidenceType II supernovaObservatory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core collapse supernovae (CCSNe) are amongst the most powerful cosmic sources of neutrinos. The extreme environment during the supernova evolution provides opportunities to probe neutrino properties which are not accessible on Earth. In this thesis, the response to supernova neutrinos of the SNO+ experiment is explored as a representative case of neutrino detectors. SNO+, the successor of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO), is a 780-tonne liquid scintillator detector located 2 km underground in Sudbury, Canada. The primary purpose of SNO+ is to detect the neutrinoless double beta (0νββ) in 130Te. During the time period covered by this thesis, SNO+ has undergone the transition from water phase to scintillator phase. By performing a bismuth-polonium (BiPo) coincidence study throughout the period, the 238U and 232Th chain, which are important backgrounds to 0νββ, concentrations in the scintillator have been measured to be (4.6 ± 1.2)×10−17 g/g and (4.8 ± 0.9)×10−17 g/g, respectively. With the measured radioactive background level and calibrated light yield level, a supernova burst trigger was developed. The study showed that SNO+ has the potential of detecting CCSNe at 100 kpc. The experience with the coincidence study was also found to be useful in the identification of inverse beta decay (IBD) signals, which is an important supernova neutrino signal common amongst different detectors. One application of this shared neutrino signal is the positioning of supernovae via multi-detector triangulation, which can serve as an alert to other channels of detection. This thesis presents a method using the comparison of light curves to determine the signal arrival time difference between pairs of detectors. The results outperformed existing methods by further reducing the uncertainty by about 30%. Finally, it was noticed during the triangulation study that the formation of black holes could potentially introduce additional resolution power. Previous studies on the black hole cut-off mostly focused on radial neutrino emissions. To investigate the effect of the black hole, a ray-trace study was performed to give a comprehensive account of the effects of including emissions from all angles upon black hole formation. Both the cases of non-rotating and rotating black holes were discussed. It was discovered that the non-radial emissions contribute a softening to the profile in both cases. Furthermore, extreme rotation introduces significant changes to the tail of the profile, which may be observable with next-generation neutrino detectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)Same topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207