MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116440211 · doi:10.3138/jeunesse-2023-0043

Aisha Jackson on the Broadway Musical Stage: An <i>Afro-Fabulative</i> Embodiment of Princess Anna in <i>Frozen: The Broadway Musical</i>

2025· article· en· W7116440211 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christine Case

Bibliographic record

VenueJeunesse Young People Texts Cultures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheater, Performance, and Music History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMusicalPerforming artsBlack BritishPerformance artCharacter (mathematics)Black music

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2018 original cast of Frozen: The Broadway Musical included Black performer Aisha Jackson as the alternate for the role of Anna. I argue that Jackson’s live performances as Anna, from 2018 to 2020, celebrate Black artistry and Black girlhood, enabling Black fan communities to see themselves mirrored in a Disney Princess, even one not originally written as Black. The significance of spotlighting Jackson’s embodiment of Princess Anna grows from the extended invisibilization of Blackness in youth narratives. Jackson’s performances as Anna allow for a Black main character and a Black artist/creator to be visibilized in the Frozen franchise. This article strives to centre and archive Black performance and contextualize Frozen: The Broadway Musical as an afro-fabulative affiliate of Black Broadway. I turn to Tavia Nyong’o’s articulations of afro-fabulation to read Black performance through Black performance scholarship, and I understand afro-fabulation’s insistent presencing of Blackness as an example of bringing the dark fantastic onto centre stage and into the spotlight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0130.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJeunesse Young People Texts CulturesSame topicTheater, Performance, and Music HistoryFrench-language works237,207