MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116590490

Hubungan Kepemimpinan Kepala Ruang Dengan Implementasi Bedside Handover Pada Perawat Di Ruang Rawat Inap RSUD Dr. Soegiri Lamongan

2024· other· id· W7116590490 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
- Andi Megaretha

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversitas Airlangga Repository (Universitas Airlangga) · 2024
Typeother
Languageid
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Officer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pajak merupakan iuran yang dapat bersifat wajib untuk dibayarkan oleh warga negara kepada negara, serta dapat bersifat memaksa dan tidak mendapatkan imbalan secara langsung dengan dipergunakan untuk kepentingan negara. Surat Permintaan Penjelasan Data dan (SP2DK) merupakan surat yang dibuat oleh Kepala Kantor Pelayanan Pajak (KPP) dengan tujuan untuk meminta penjelasan atas data dan keterangan kepada wajib pajak yang bersangkutan. Hal ini dikarenakan adanya temuan dugaan bahwa wajib pajak tersebut melakukan hal yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban perpajakan sesuai dengan peraturan perundang- undangan yang telah berlaku.Petugas pajak telah mengirimkan SP2DK kepada PT X pada tahun 2019, hal ini dikarenakan adanya temuan bahwa terdapat perbedaan antara biaya gaji dalam SPT Tahunan PPh Badan dengan penghasilan bruto dalam SPT PPh 21.Kesimpulannya yaitu bahwa petugas pajak menginginkan suatu penjelasan atas data dan keterangan yang dimiliki oleh PT X. Khususnya terdapat perbedaan selisih antara biaya gaji dalam SPT Tahunan PPh Badan dengan penghasilan bruto dalam SPT PPh 21 tahun pajak 2019. Sehingga dikirimkannya SP2DK kepada PT X untuk diberi kesempatan agar segera memberikan surat tanggapan berupa penjelasan mengenai permasalahan atau perbedaan tersebut.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0630.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversitas Airlangga Repository (Universitas Airlangga)French-language works237,207