MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116592369

Multiple System Atrophy Without Dysautonomia: An Autopsy-Confirmed Study.

2025· article· en· W7116592369 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDZNE Pub · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersParkinsonfondenNational Institutes of HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchParkinson CanadaEdmond J. Safra Philanthropic FoundationPfizerDemensförbundetUniversity of PennsylvaniaLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenBayer VitalFondation Brain CanadaTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesBristol-Myers SquibbEli Lilly and CompanyBiogen
KeywordsDysautonomiaParkinsonismAtrophyCohortDiseaseCerebellar ataxiaMovement disordersParkinson's diseaseCentral nervous system disease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by 3 core symptom complexes: parkinsonism, cerebellar syndrome, and dysautonomia. Recent Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria allow for the clinical diagnosis of MSA based solely on motor symptoms, without requiring dysautonomia. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and disease trajectory of MSA patients without dysautonomia compared with those with autonomic involvement.A multicenter cohort of autopsy-confirmed patients with MSA was analyzed for demographic characteristics, symptom onset, and progression of parkinsonism, cerebellar syndrome, and dysautonomia. Clinical data were collected through standardized chart reviews across participating centers and categorized using the MDS-MSA criteria. Patients were grouped according to their initial symptom complex and tracked for the evolution of additional symptoms. Analyses included time to development of further symptom complexes, age at symptom onset, disease duration, and phenotype at the last recorded visit. Patients with motor symptoms only were matched to patients with similar demographics but with dysautonomia. Statistical methods included ANOVA, t tests, Welch t tests, and χ2 tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.Among 140 patients (mean age at onset 62.3 ± 8.9 years; 44% female), 81 (58%) initially presented without dysautonomia (57 with parkinsonism only, 17 with cerebellar syndrome only, 7 with both). At final follow-up, 12 patients (9%) had not developed dysautonomia. These patients showed significantly longer disease duration (mean 8.1 ± 2.1 years) than matched patients with dysautonomia (mean 6.3 ± 2.6 years; p = 0.035). Overall, 51% of patients developed all 3 symptom complexes. Patients with cerebellar onset progressed more rapidly to multisystem involvement than those with parkinsonian onset (mean interval to second symptom: 2.0 vs 3.4 years; p < 0.05).The MDS-MSA criteria expand the diagnostic scope by identifying a motor-only subgroup with a distinct and potentially slower disease course. These findings underscore the importance of including motor-only patients in natural history and interventional studies. Limitations include retrospective data collection and potential variability in symptom documentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDZNE PubSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207