El cooperativismo cafetalero del estado mexicano de Chiapas: un ejemplo de Economía Social y Solidaria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Economía Social y Solidaria es una construcción teórica y práctica que contradice determinados axiomas de la Teoría Económica clásica, y el Comercio Justo es una de sus manifestaciones. Los productores y consumidores que participan en el Comercio Justo muestran comportamientos que se guían más por motivaciones solidarias que por el deseo de maximizar su beneficio. El desarrollo del cooperativismo cafetalero que se inició en el estado mexicano de Chiapas a principios de los años 1980 es un ejemplo de ello. Sus ejes fueron la producción de café ecológico y su comercialización a través de los circuitos del Comercio Justo. Las cooperativas se articularon en una coordinadora estatal y se produjo un fenómeno solidario en virtud del cual las cooperativas ya existentes prestaban ayuda a las de nueva creación. De esta manera, los productores accedieron a mercados que valoraban su producción equitativa socialmente y respetuosa ambientalmente.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".