X-ray Coherent Diffractive Imaging of Large Helium Nanodroplets Doped with Small Molecules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the first X-ray coherent diffractive imaging experiment on molecule-doped helium nanodroplets. It complements previous work, where we reported single-shot X-ray coherent diffractive imaging studies of Xe dopant clusters formed in 4 He and 3 He droplets. These noble gas clusters were used to visualize the impact of rotational excitation of the droplets on the spatial distribution of atomic dopants within the droplets, and to study the differences and connections between quantum and classical droplet rotational motion. Here, we expand our studies to the molecular dopants CF 4, CHF 3, CH 3 CN, and SF 6, imaged with 1.5 keV photons. We find multiple Bragg spots in the diffraction patterns of molecule-doped droplets with radii of approximately 600 nm, which provide evidence that molecules form elongated clusters with preferential alignment along the angular momentum axis of the 4 He droplets, in agreement with our previous results on the aggregation of Xe clusters on quantum vortices. Real-space reconstructions of molecular dopant cluster density profiles are obtained for droplets with smaller radii of approximately 300 nm. The diffuse images suggest the formation of low-density, potentially porous, molecular clusters upon aggregation at T = 0.4 K in 4 He droplets. In the normal fluid 3 He droplets, molecules aggregate into loose clusters on the droplets’ equator, similar to previous observations for Xe atoms. Time-of-flight mass spectra reveal that the doped helium nanodroplet moieties fragment extensively into constituent atomic ions, producing only a small fraction of molecular fragment ions. The findings are discussed in the context of previously proposed schemes to use He droplets as potential tamper materials for ultrafast X-ray imaging experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".