MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116690767 · doi:10.1016/j.imu.2025.101728

Evaluating cultural impact on subject-independent EEG-based emotion recognition approaches

2025· article· en· W7116690767 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInformatics in Medicine Unlocked · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Winnipeg
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGermanElectroencephalographyEmotional expressionMultinomial logistic regressionDeep learningEmotion classificationEmotion recognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Culture plays a crucial role in shaping emotional expression and recognition, influencing how individuals perceive and regulate emotions. Electroencephalography (EEG) can capture electrical activity associated with human emotion processing from the scalp. The electrical activity can be processed using deep learning models to predict emotional states. Two approaches can be employed to develop these deep learning models: subject-dependent and subject-independent. The subject-independent approach is more practical as it trains the model on data from some individuals and tests it on entirely different individuals, ensuring it generalizes well to new users. However, because of the high variability of EEG across individuals, the subject-independent approach tends to yield low performance. Recent studies suggest incorporating demographic information along with EEG signals is one way to overcome this issue. By using the subject-independent approach, this study investigates how cultural factors impact emotion prediction. Specifically, we used a stacking model that combines deep learning with multinomial logistic regression to predict positive, neutral, and negative emotions among 15 Chinese, 8 French, and 8 German subjects. Our approach achieved accuracies of 77.3% for Chinese subjects, 73% for French subjects, and 65% for German subjects, which are comparable to or exceed accuracies reported by previous studies. Our approach highlighted that incorporating cultural information increases the likelihood of predicting positive emotions for Chinese participants and negative emotions for Europeans. Moreover, French and German subjects exhibited similar neural patterns across all emotions, suggesting a more common cultural sharing between those subjects. Overall, our findings emphasize the importance of integrating cultural considerations into emotion recognition models. This inclusion not only improves emotion prediction accuracy for subject-independent approaches but also promotes inclusivity and ethical practices in emotion recognition systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it