MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116696817 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3646620

Underwater Acoustic Spectrum Sensing Algorithm Based on Personalized Federated Learning and RepViG

2025· article· W7116696817 on OpenAlexaff
Kai Wang, Jun Fang, Liliang Zhang, Ping Xiao, Bo Cai, Gengfeng Zheng, T. Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsUnderwaterUnderwater acoustic communicationUnderwater acousticsConvolution (computer science)Feature (linguistics)UpsamplingWaveletSonarBlock (permutation group theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ocean Internet of Things (OIoT) has promoted the development of the ocean devices, which generate a large amount of underwater acoustic data. The transmission of underwater acoustic data requires a large amount of spectrum resources. Aiming at the problems of improving the utilization rate and security of spectrum resources, an underwater acoustic spectrum sensing algorithm based on personalized federated learning (PFL) and RepViG is proposed. A security protection framework is established for underwater acoustic data based on PFL. The common features of each underwater acoustic data are extracted through the meta-model. Each client only needs to fine-tune the parameters of the meta-model based on the local underwater acoustic data to achieve a personalized model. Based on the improved RepViT and the improved ViG, a dual-branch sensing model of RepViG is designed. In the improved RepViT, we employ the Haar wavelet downsampling (HWD) module to retain the low-frequency and high-frequency detail features of the underwater acoustic signal through multi-resolution. And we employ Interactive Convolution Block (ICB) to capture the relationship between local features and global features through multi-scale dynamic convolution kernels. In the improved ViG, we adopt the lightweight Star-Blcok module to reduce feature redundancy and enhance sensing efficiency. Compared with other algorithms, the simulation results show that the detection probability is increased by 7.6%, and the false alarm probability is reduced by 7.5%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207