MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116708567 · doi:10.1016/j.wse.2025.12.005

Enhancing mean flow characteristics and reducing turbulence in channel transition using honeycomb

2025· article· en· W7116708567 on OpenAlexafffund
Mustafa Alkayed, Behzad Lak, S.Samuel Li

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Science and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTurbulenceHoneycombFlow (mathematics)Channel (broadcasting)Honeycomb structureOpen-channel flowSecondary flowMean flow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An open-channel transition is needed in most water conveyance channels to connect channel sections with different cross-sectional shapes, areas, bottom slopes, or their combinations. However, these transitions inherently create adverse pressure gradients, flow separation, turbulent eddies, and energy losses, presenting a long-standing hydraulic issue. This study investigated a warped transition (WT), a transition type favored for its smooth linking geometry, which connected a small rectangular upstream channel section to a large downstream trapezoidal section, and evaluated the effectiveness of installing a honeycomb in the WT to reduce turbulence and improve flow characteristics and hydraulic efficiency. The three-dimensional velocity field of turbulent flow was measured using an acoustic Doppler velocimeter. The results showed that the honeycomb effectively improved mean flow properties by enhancing the uniformity of primary flow and reducing the strength of secondary currents and reversed flow. The cell size of the honeycomb limited the formation of larger energy-bearing turbulent eddies. Compared to a conventional WT without a honeycomb, the modified transition exhibited less severe flow separation and lower turbulence intensities. Implementing a honeycomb is a practical and inexpensive intervention for both existing and new transitions. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for improving the design of water conveyance channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Science and EngineeringSame topicHydraulic flow and structuresFrench-language works237,207