MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116721498 · doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2025.11.001

The pentoxifylline and tocopherol protocol and its use in the management of osteoradionecrosis of the jaws

2025· article· en· W7116721498 on OpenAlexaff
Robert T. Carriero, Aviv Ouanounou

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the American Dental Association · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOral health in cancer treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoradionecrosisPentoxifyllineProtocol (science)RegimenRandomized controlled trialTocopherol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a severe complication of external beam radiation therapy or brachytherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Traditional theories of its etiology have been unsuccessful in producing a standardized treatment protocol. The theory of radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) proposes that radiation is responsible for the formation of reactive oxygen species, cytokine production, and constitutive phenotypic expression of myofibroblasts contributing to the development of ORN. The support of the RIF theory in the development of ORN is the basis for the pentoxifylline and tocopherol (PENTO) protocol for the prevention and management of ORN. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The authors searched for studies published through April 6, 2025, in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect. Peer-reviewed publications were included if they were written in the English language, studied the use of the PENTO protocol, and had "pentoxifylline," "osteoradionecrosis," and "jaw" in their title, abstract, or key words. Sixty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria, 60 of which were included in this scoping review. RESULTS: The authors aimed to describe the pathophysiology of RIF and determine whether the PENTO protocol is effective in the treatment and prevention of ORN of the jaws, thereby warranting further research. The results of this review suggest the PENTO protocol may provide a viable method of both prevention and management of ORN. However, further research is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of the PENTO protocol. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The authors emphasized the need for a well-formulated, multidisciplinary, double-blinded, prospective, randomized clinical trial to investigate the use of the PENTO protocol in the prevention and management of ORN of the jaws. Determining the most effective PENTO regimen will maximize patient healing and minimize morbidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the American Dental AssociationSame topicOral health in cancer treatmentFrench-language works237,207