MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116726930 · doi:10.70121/001c.154723

Using Meteorological and Geospatial Data to Investigate November 2013 Typhoon Haiyan’s Impact in the Philippines

2025· article· en· W7116726930 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Charles Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarly review . · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirectorate for Biological SciencesBrock University
KeywordsTyphoonGeospatial analysisTropical cycloneHazardCluster analysisEmergency response

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Typhoons (also known as hurricanes or tropical cyclones) can cause widespread destruction, particularly in vulnerable countries like the Philippines. Historical impact data provide valuable insights into factors influencing typhoon damage and can help improve disaster response by identifying heavily and mildly affected areas. This study utilizes Google Earth Engine to access and analyze meteorological and geospatial data in early November 2013, at the municipal level for Typhoon Haiyan, one of the most destructive typhoons in recent history. Hazard impact data from the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC) were analyzed using correlation, multiple linear regression, and clustering methods. Results indicate that windspeed and rainfall are dominant factors in determining the percentage of persons affected. Clustering analysis reveals that municipalities experiencing windspeeds exceeding 11.51 m/s suffered the greatest impacts. These findings highlight important factors influencing variability in typhoon impacts. This approach offers a useful framework for rapid impact assessment of future typhoons in the Philippines and elsewhere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarly review .Same topicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones ResearchFrench-language works237,207