MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Nanobioarray Chip Intended for Fast and Multiplex Antibody Detection in Biological Fluids Delivered by Centrifugal Pumping

2025· preprint· W7116732553 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jonathan Lee, Mahsa Gharibi Marzancola, Paul C. H. Li, Naveed Gulzar, Jamie K. Scott

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsBiotinylationStreptavidinPolyclonal antibodiesMonoclonal antibodyDetection limitMultiplexBiological fluidsChip

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nanobioarray (NBA) chip has been developed with the goal of having a high throughput system that analyze proteins of low sample volumes against multiple probes in a short time. A combination of horizontal and vertical channels are produced to create an antigen array on the surface of the NBA chip in one dimension that is probed by flowing protein samples (e.g. antibodies) from biological fluids in the orthogonal dimension. To improve sensitivity, we have tested the NBA chip by immobilizing streptavidin and then biotinylated peptide to detect the presence of a mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) that is specific for the peptide. Bound antibody is detected by an AlexaFluor 647 labeled goat (anti-mouse IgG) polyclonal antibody. Using this NBA chip, we have successfully detected antibodies in samples in 500 nL containing 50 pM of MAb (or 25 attomoles), and this demonstrates a detection limit below that of a comparable ELISA, utilizing a shorter reaction time. Such a system is intended for assays of protein mixtures in biofluids, even for proteomic studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.orgSame topicAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207