MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116741168 · doi:10.1099/acmi.0.001160.v1

Reactive Infectious Mucocutaneous Eruption secondary to Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in a 19-year-old

2025· article· W7116741168 on OpenAlexaff
Cole Schonhofer, Divya Santhanam, Jollee S.T. Fung, Natasha Press

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChlamydiaMucositisMucocutaneous zoneMycoplasma pneumoniaeAntibioticsAzithromycinRespiratory systemRespiratory infection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Reactive Infectious Mucocutaneous Eruption (RIME) is a phenomenon that occurs predominantly in children and young adults following a bacterial or viral respiratory infection. While RIME is most associated with Mycoplasma pneumoniae, it has rarely been described with other respiratory pathogens. Case Report An otherwise healthy 19-year-old male presented with cough, fever, conjunctivitis, oral mucositis with ulceration preventing food intake, and dysuria. Chlamydia pneumoniae was detected on nasopharyngeal swab by PCR while broad workup of alternative infectious and autoimmune causes was unremarkable. Despite supportive care, antibiotics, and initial steroid treatment, his mucositis necessitated hospital admission and eventually steroid regimen intensification before fully resolving. Conclusion Chlamydia pneumoniae should be considered as a possible trigger of RIME in adolescents and young adults. Treatment involves supportive care, antibiotics and steroids if RIME symptoms are severe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReproductive tract infections research→French-language works237,207→