Younger midlife females with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: respiratory disturbances during sleep
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There are many menopauses; bilateral oophorectomy is associated with the worst cognitive outcomes. Compared to females with intact ovaries, females with bilateral oophorectomy experience early, abrupt ovarian hormone loss and are at increased risk for later-life Alzheimer's disease. They also have double the odds of developing later-life sleep disordered breathing (SDB) - a modifiable Alzheimer's risk factor. With respect to bilateral oophorectomy, it is unknown when respiratory disturbances occur or whether estradiol therapy (ET) ameliorates them. Also unknown is whether SDB influences cognition in this group. METHOD: = 17) were assessed for SDB markers using take-home polysomnography and for working memory performance. RESULTS: The BSO group showed signs of respiratory disturbance compared to the AMC group. Memory performance was uncorrelated with respiratory metrics. While the BSO+ET group showed an intermediate sleep phenotype, estrone glucuronide levels correlated with improved respiratory metrics. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that respiratory disturbances manifest as early as 5 years post-BSO in younger females; ET offers some amelioration. The close relationship between sleep disruption and Alzheimer's risk emphasizes the importance of SDB screening post-BSO for early intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it