Younger midlife females with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: respiratory disturbances during sleep
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There are many menopauses; bilateral oophorectomy is associated with the worst cognitive outcomes. Compared to females with intact ovaries, females with bilateral oophorectomy experience early, abrupt ovarian hormone loss and are at increased risk for later-life Alzheimer's disease. They also have double the odds of developing later-life sleep disordered breathing (SDB) - a modifiable Alzheimer's risk factor. With respect to bilateral oophorectomy, it is unknown when respiratory disturbances occur or whether estradiol therapy (ET) ameliorates them. Also unknown is whether SDB influences cognition in this group. METHOD: = 17) were assessed for SDB markers using take-home polysomnography and for working memory performance. RESULTS: The BSO group showed signs of respiratory disturbance compared to the AMC group. Memory performance was uncorrelated with respiratory metrics. While the BSO+ET group showed an intermediate sleep phenotype, estrone glucuronide levels correlated with improved respiratory metrics. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that respiratory disturbances manifest as early as 5 years post-BSO in younger females; ET offers some amelioration. The close relationship between sleep disruption and Alzheimer's risk emphasizes the importance of SDB screening post-BSO for early intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".