MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116766578 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.12.204

Enhancing Insulin Delivery in Type 1 Diabetes with the Detection of Insulin Flow Interruption

2025· article· en· W7116766578 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Razi Hamdi, Marzia Cescon

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJuvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Canada
KeywordsType 1 diabetesInsulin pumpInsulinInsulin deliveryArtificial pancreasDiabetes mellitusMetabolic control analysisHypoglycemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work focuses on the efficient regulation of blood glucose (BG) in people with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) by means of automated subcutaneous insulin delivery through a pump, which is essential to mimic the real-life functioning of a healthy pancreas and improve the quality of life for patients. In particular, this research addresses one of the bottlenecks in insulin pump therapy, namely the detection of insulin infusion occlusions and consequent interruption of the flow of insulin into the portal circulation, before the degradation of glucose control can be measured. We exploit a digital twin of a mechanical pump and incorporate it in a large scale metabolic model of T1D glucose dynamics. Our failure detection algorithms is based on the displacement of the pump’s piston after an injection of insulin. We test our approach in simulation showing promising results for the early detection of insulin flow interruptions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207