Estrés Laboral y Rendimiento Cognitivo de funcionarios de una Universidad en Chile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Nowadays, stress has become a societal problem, especially work-related stress, as excessive stress leads to a decline in workers’ cognitive abilities, disrupting their mental health and affecting their daily lives. Method: A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional study. To assess stress and cognitive impairment in the workplace among professors, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14) were used Results: The results showed that the minimum score obtained on the MoCA test was 21 points, corresponding to mild cognitive impairment (MCI), while the maximum score was 29 points. The average MoCA score was 25.55 ± 2.18 points. Regarding total stress, the minimum recorded score was 22, with no participant free of stress, and the maximum score was 39. The average total stress score was 31.95 ± 4 points Conclusions: There is an urgent need to implement strategies to prevent work-related stress factors that affect cognitive functioning. To this end, it is essential to clearly define job positions and responsibilities, provide adequate and comfortable working conditions, efficiently organize activities, offer training, provide support for personal problems, and promote work flexibility, among other measures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".