MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116774106 · doi:10.3986/dmd21.2.05

Opera at Home: Music in Noble Households in Mid-Eighteenth-Century Gorizia

2025· article· sl· W7116774106 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Metoda Kokole

Bibliographic record

VenueDe musica disserenda · 2025
Typearticle
Languagesl
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusicology and Musical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSlovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti
KeywordsOperaQuarter (Canadian coin)Point (geometry)George (robot)Foundation (evidence)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1744 Gorizia saw the foundation of the learned Accademia dei Filomeleti, frequented by the town’s elite. From 1740 the operas were regularly produced in the Bandeu theatre. The most popular arias were also performed privately. A case in point is a manuscript collection (I-GOp, Misc. Mus. 3–5). Nearly a quarter of the pieces are compositions by Giovanni Battista Pergolesi, but it also contains arias by lesser-known masters such as Andrea Bernasconi and Paolo Scalabrini.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDe musica disserendaSame topicMusicology and Musical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207