MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116801226 · doi:10.17219/dmp/178326

Identification of salivary volatile organic compounds as the potential diagnostic markers of oral cancer by the gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis

2025· article· en· W7116801226 on OpenAlex
Sreekanth PUTHUPARAMBIL Kunjumon, Sujatha SAMPIGE REDDY, NAGARAJU RAKESH, Shwetha Venkataramana, Ruchika Chaudhary, Vaishnavi PALANISAMY, LAIPUBAM FABINA SHARMA

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDental and Medical Problems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsASTER
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetabolomicsGas chromatography–mass spectrometryIdentification (biology)Mass spectrometryCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Oral cancer (OC) is a major public health problem in the Indian subcontinent. As many as 90% of all OC cases are oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs), often developing from oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). Although the oral cavity is freely accessible, visual identification is often challenging. Biopsy and a microscopic examination is the only confirmatory diagnostic test. Recently, the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) has emerged as a new, non-invasive, rapid, and inexpensive strategy with promising potential in clinical diagnostics. The human VOCs produced in metabolic pathways, present in body fluids and the exhaled air, can be used for monitoring several oral diseases, including OC. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to determine the potential diagnostic capabilities of salivary VOCs in OC through identifying and comparing the salivary volatilomic profiles among OSCC and OPMD subjects, as well as healthy controls, using the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Unstimulated saliva samples were collected from 35 OSCC subjects, 35 OPMD subjects and 40 healthy controls. The VOCs extracted from the ZSM-5/PDMS film were condensed with 100 μL of methanol, of which 1.0 μL was subjected to the GC-MS analysis. RESULTS: A total of 128 salivary VOCs were detected and identified among the OSCC and OPMD subjects and the healthy controls. Twenty-five metabolites were determined to be statistically significant in differentiating among the 3 groups. Organic acids, alcohols, ketones, alkanes, and acid amides were the major classes of VOCs in the OSCC subjects, while organic acids, alcohols, ketones, acid amides, heterocyclic compounds, and phenols constituted the VOC profile in the OPMD subjects. 1-chloro-dodecane and 1-tridecanol were significant VOCs observed among the controls. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that salivary VOC profiling can reveal distinct metabolomic alterations in OSCC and OPMDs, with several VOCs emerging as potential tumor-specific biomarkers. While these findings highlight the promise of VOC-based screening, larger studies are needed to validate these markers and establish their clinical applicability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it