MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116832882 · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2025.09.038

Exploring Gender-based Experiences in a Digitally Delivered Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: Qualitative Insights From the My Heart Coach Program

2025· article· en· W7116832882 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Shaina Corrick, Holly Minckler, Julian Mansour, Corrie Effa, T Meyer, Gábor Gyenes, Ashley Hyde, Puneeta Tandon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSport Psychology and Performance
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesAlberta HealthUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity Hospital FoundationMitacsAlberta Health Services
KeywordsRehabilitationQualitative researchDigital healthMEDLINEmHealth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a cornerstone of secondary prevention for individuals with cardiovascular disease, yet participation remains suboptimal, particularly among women. Digital CR programs offer flexible alternatives; however, little is known about how gender influences engagement and experience in these settings. METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study explored gendered experiences within the My Heart Coach (MHC) digital CR program. Thirty-two participants (20 women, 12 men), mean age 63.7 years, who had completed the 12-week program were purposively sampled to ensure diversity in education, employment, stress, ethnicity, and geographic region. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between November 2024 and May 2025, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns in participant narratives. Data collection and analysis proceeded iteratively until thematic saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Three major themes were identified. Theme one, "From Cardiac Event to Recovery - Characterizing the MHC Cohort," explores participants' gender-based experiences of having a cardiac event. Theme two, "Gender and Accessibility with Digital Program Elements," highlights gender-based differences in engagement with the CR program. Women and men encountered distinct barriers and facilitators, with women prioritizing flexibility and social connection, and men valuing privacy and autonomy. Theme three, "Rebuilding - Gendered Motivations and Identity in Digital Cardiac Rehabilitation," explores other program motivators, facilitators, and changes following completion of the digital program. CONCLUSION: Gender shapes how participants experience and engage in digital CR programs. These findings underscore the need for a gender-responsive design in CR that can enhance participation and support diverse needs in a scalable manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Cardiology→Same topicSport Psychology and Performance→French-language works237,207→