MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Design and Implementation of a Plastic Optical Fiber-Based Displacement Sensor System

2025· article· W7116845427 on OpenAlexaff
Lorant Andras Szolga, Swarnamouli Majumdar, Adriana Ioana Potarniche

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisplacement (psychology)Tilt (camera)Angular displacementReflection (computer programming)SoftwareOptical fiberLaserServo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design, development, and implementation of a displacement sensor system using Plastic Optical Fiber (POF) technology. The system utilizes a laser diode, four optical receivers, a mirror, and a servo motor, all of which are controlled through an ATmega328P microcontroller. Displacement is detected by analyzing the angular reflection of a laser beam on a mirror, with light directed into POF-guided sensors. Two computational methods are proposed for fiber alignment based on mirror tilt angle and sensor-mirror geometry, enabling precise displacement measurements. A functional prototype was fabricated using custom PCBs and 3Dprinted enclosures, and its performance was validated through experiments that correlated mirror tilt angles (5° to 20°) with sensor activation. A dedicated software interface was developed for real-time monitoring and control. The system achieved accurate displacement detection with well-defined angle-sensor mappings. This low-cost, compact, and efficient design demonstrates high potential for applications in industrial monitoring, robotics, and healthcare, where precision and electromagnetic immunity are essential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors→French-language works237,207→