MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116853480 · doi:10.1002/alz70861_108696

Medial Temporal Lobe Flexibility as an Early Marker of Alzheimer’s Risk in African Americans with ABCA7‐80 Variant: Application to Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations using Random Forest

2025· article· en· W7116853480 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rutvik Deshpande, Soodeh Moallemian, Abolfazl Saghafi, Miray Budak, Bernadette A. Fausto, Mark A. Gluck

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImputation (statistics)Random forestFlexibility (engineering)Multivariate statisticsNeuroimagingRegressionCorrelationTemporal lobe

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by progressive neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Medial Temporal Lobe (MTL) Flexibility, measured from dynamic functional connectivity in resting‐state fMRI, may serve as a biomarker for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and AD. The ABCA7‐80 variant is associated with increased dementia risk, particularly among African Americans; however, few studies have examined its relationship with MTL Flexibility. Furthermore, missing data remains a pervasive challenge in AD research, often driven by participant burden and health factors. This study investigates the association between ABCA7‐80 and MTL Flexibility, using Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations Forest (MICEforest) to address high amount of missing data. Method 656 participants were included, enrolled in the Pathways to Healthy Aging in African Americans study. Participants underwent blood draws, MRI scans, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). We first performed partial correlation between ABCA7‐80 gene and MTL Flexibility, adjusting for age, sex, education on the 224 participants (Mean age = 69.7 ± 7.2 years) with MTL flexibility score (pairwise deletion technique). Then a linear regression model was fitted on the data to predict MTL flexibility using ABAC7‐80. Same analyses were used to test the data after MICEforest imputation on the full sample (n = 656; Mean age = 69.5 ± 7.4 years). Result In the pairwise deleted dataset, almost significant association was found between MTL Flexibility and ABCA7‐80 (r = ‐0.141, p > 0.058) after adjusting for age, sex, education and MoCA score. After imputing the missing data, ABCA7‐80 high‐risk allele carriers showed significantly lower MTL Flexibility (r = ‐0.082, p < 0.05). Our regression analysis on the imputed data reveals that ABCA7‐80 can predict the MTL flexibility after controlling for age, sex, education and cognition (R² = 0.026, p = 0.003). Conclusion Our findings reinforce the role of ABCA7‐80 as a genetic risk factor for AD and suggest reduced MTL Flexibility as an early biomarker of vulnerability. Notably, MICEforest imputation empowered our analyses revealing statistically significant correlation and a linear regression model between MTL Flexibility and ABCA7‐80 gene. This highlights the importance of robust imputation strategies for maximizing the utility of neuroimaging data in aging and dementia research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→