Effects of commercial genetic selection on gene expression in the developing neuroendocrine system of broilers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Selective breeding of broilers has significantly improved growth rates, muscle mass, and feed efficiency and may have influenced the neuroendocrine systems that regulate growth and metabolism. Embryonic development represents one-third of the life of a modern broiler. To assess the impact of genetic selection on the neuroendocrine regulation of growth and metabolism during embryonic development, we examined mRNA expression of growth-related genes in the hypothalamus and anterior pituitary of two chicken breeds: the modern Ross 708 broiler and the Athens Canadian Random Bred (ACRB) line, the oldest established strain for meat-type chickens. Hypothalami and pituitary glands were dissected from embryos at days 10, 12, 14, 16, and 18 of incubation (n = 4 for each combination of breed, age, and gender). Levels of mRNA for each target gene were quantified using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. In the adrenocorticotropic axis, pituitary corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 mRNA levels were influenced by the interaction of breed, age, and gender (P < 0.05). In the thyrotropic axis, pituitary thyroid-stimulating hormone β-subunit mRNA levels were affected by the interaction of breed, age, and gender (P < 0.05). In the somatotropic axis, mRNA levels of hypothalamic somatostatin were higher in ACRB than Ross, whereas overall pituitary growth hormone mRNA levels were greater in Ross than ACRB (P < 0.05). Pituitary growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor 2 and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide receptor 1 were influenced by the interaction between breed and age (P < 0.05). In the gonadotropic axis, hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone 1 and gonadotropin-inhibiting hormone were influenced by breed, age, and gender, while mRNA levels of pituitary follicle-stimulating hormone β-subunit were affected by the interaction between breed and age (P < 0.05). Hypothalamic agouti-related peptide, neuropeptide Y, and proopiomelanocortin mRNA levels were higher in ACRB than Ross in females (P < 0.05). These findings indicate that genetic selection of broilers has altered the adrenocorticotropic, somatotropic, thyrotropic, and gonadotropic axes, as well as hypothalamic control of appetite and metabolism during embryonic development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".