MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116867305 · doi:10.1002/alz70862_109901

Brain cell densities are associated with hypometabolism and Aβ burden in Alzheimer’s disease

2025· article· en· W7116867305 on OpenAlexaff
Gabriel Bueno Martins, Christian Limberger, Gabriel Lermen Hoffmeister, Mariana Radaelli Schmaedek, Ramon Bertoldi de Souza, Roberta dos Santos de Oliveira, Marco Antônio De Bastiani, Eduardo R. Zimmer

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstrocyteDiseaseNeurogliaCellCentral nervous systemAmyloid (mycology)Human brainBrain Cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Neurons and glial cells, such as astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes, compose and orchestrate the synaptic process. The pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease (AD), which includes amyloid-beta (Aβ) accumulation, can disrupt these cell functions leading to brain glucose hypometabolism, which is generally interpreted as a signal of neurodegeneration. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the potential relationship between neuronal and glial cell densities with AD progression. Here, we investigated how brain cellular densities associate with FDG- and Aβ-PET imaging across regions implicated in AD. METHOD: We obtained FDG- and Aβ-PET images from 619 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and impaired (CI) individuals from ADNI. Brain cellular abundance maps were sourced from the Neuropm-Lab's GitHub repository. Pearson correlations were conducted between cellular densities and the mean FDG or Aβ SUVr across AD vulnerable and non-vulnerable brain regions (p <0.05). RESULT: Neuronal density positively correlates with FDG-PET in non-vulnerable regions, despite amyloid or cognitive status. However, the delta FDG SUVr (difference between CI and CU) was negatively associated with neuronal density in both non-vulnerable and vulnerable regions for FDG in A+ individuals. Alternatively, a positive correlation was observed between astrocyte density and delta FDG-PET SUVr in vulnerable regions. Oligodendrocytes showed a positive correlation in FDG-vulnerable regions regardless of amyloid or cognitive status (Figure 1A). For Aβ-PET, astrocyte density presented a negative correlation in CU A- individuals in non-vulnerable regions, while neuronal density presented negative correlations despite amyloid or cognitive status. However, in vulnerable regions astrocytes exhibited positive correlations in all groups including the delta Aβ-PET SUVr group (Figure 1B). CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal that higher astrocyte densities are linked to reduced differences in delta FDG SUVr in AD-vulnerable regions, whereas neuronal densities show an inverse correlation. Conversely, oligodendrocytes display positive correlations with FDG-PET. This suggests a compensatory glial metabolism aimed at preserving neuronal homeostasis, supported by the higher proportion of these cells compared to neurons across all brain regions (Figure 1C and D). Additionally, analysis of Aβ-PET data reveals that regions with a higher astrocyte density are linked to a lower amyloid burden in vulnerable areas, further emphasizing the role of glia on amyloid pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→