MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116872469 · doi:10.64898/2025.12.19.695579

A haplotype-resolved, chromosome-scale genome assembly and annotation for <i>Carya glabra</i> (pignut hickory; Juglandaceae)

2025· article· W7116872469 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shengchen Shan, Baylee Klein, Arthur Oganisyan, Gia Serrano, Bryanna Stults, Rubina Torkzadeh, Audrey K. Tucker, Ezra Linnan, Benjamin H. Pringle, Tyler Radtke, Moumita Hoque Rainy, Lia Swanson, Gabrielle Vines, Lauren Whitt, Alex Harkess, Pamela Sue Soltis, Douglas E Soltis

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldNursing
TopicNuts composition and effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGenomeHaplotypeAnnotationSequence assemblyGenome projectGenePolyploidGene AnnotationGenomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Carya glabra (2 n = 4 x = 64), also known as pignut hickory, is a widely distributed species in the walnut family (Juglandaceae). Native to the central and eastern United States and southeastern Canada, C. glabra plays an important ecological role as a common upland forest species; it is closely related to several economically valuable nut trees, including C. illinoinensis (pecan). A deeper understanding of the genetics of C. glabra is essential for studying its evolutionary history and biology, with potential implications for agricultural improvement of pecan. Here, we present the first nuclear genome assembly and annotation of C. glabra . The assembly is chromosome-level and phased, representing the first assembled polyploid genome in the genus Carya . A total of 64 pseudochromosomes were assembled and phased into four haplotypes. The haplotype A assembly spans 600.4 Mb, comprises 55.0% repetitive sequences, and contains 30,947 protein-coding genes, with a BUSCO completeness score of 97.7%. Functional annotation assigned 94.3% of haplotype A genes to gene families, and 79.7% and 86.3% of genes were annotated with Gene Ontology terms and protein domains, respectively; 635 putative plant disease resistance genes were found in haplotype A. The other three haplotypes exhibited similarly high-quality annotation metrics. Our genomic analyses also suggest that C. glabra is an autotetraploid. Comparative genomic analyses revealed high collinearity among the four haplotypes of C. glabra and the published genomes of three other Carya species, although structural variation among the genomes of these species was identified. In addition, we provide an improved chloroplast genome assembly and the first mitochondrial genome for C. glabra . Importantly, most members of the research team are undergraduate students; the sequenced individual is located in McCarty Woods, a Conservation Area on the University of Florida campus. This work highlights the value of genome assembly efforts as powerful tools for teaching genomics and supporting conservation initiatives. This first high-quality reference genome for C. glabra provides a valuable resource for studying Carya , a genus of significant ecological and economic importance. Article summary Carya glabra (pignut hickory) is a common upland forest species in North America. This species is a member of the walnut family (Juglandaceae), which includes many economically important nut trees. Here, we present the first nuclear genome assembly and annotation of C. glabra . The assembly is chromosome-level and phased. The haplotype A assembly contains 30,947 protein-coding genes, with a BUSCO completeness score of 97.7%. Our genomic analyses suggest that C. glabra is an autopolyploid. We also provide chloroplast and mitochondrial genome assemblies. This nuclear genome provides a valuable resource for studying Carya , a genus of significant ecological and economic importance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicNuts composition and effectsFrench-language works237,207