Enterovirus Encephalitis in People With Multiple Sclerosis on Ocrelizumab
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Anti-CD20 therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) are highly effective at preventing disease activity. Recognizing infectious complications of these therapies is essential. METHODS: Three MS centers shared deidentified clinical data on persons with MS (pwMS) receiving ocrelizumab who developed enterovirus encephalitis. RESULTS: Five pwMS (4 with relapsing-remitting MS, 1 with secondary progressive MS) on ocrelizumab were identified. At diagnosis, the median age was 34 years (range, 30-57), the median MS duration was 5 years (range, 2-13), and the median ocrelizumab exposure was 3 years (range, 2-7). Four had young children who were recently ill, including 2 with hand, foot, and mouth disease. MRI brain revealed new nonenhancing T2 hyperintensities in the thalamus (2), substantia nigra (2), cerebellum (2), and pons (1). All had CSF pleocytosis (median, 57/mcL; range, 33-175). Enterovirus was detected by reverse-transcription PCR in CSF (4) and blood (2). Hypogammaglobulinemia was present in 4 patients tested; 1 also had neutropenia. Three received IV immunoglobulin. At follow-up (median, 7 months; range, 3-15), 1 patient had fully recovered and 4 had residual symptoms (cognitive, 1; gait impairment, 3). DISCUSSION: Enterovirus encephalitis is a rare but serious complication in pwMS receiving ocrelizumab; hypogammaglobulinemia may increase risk. Clinician awareness and prompt testing may improve outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".