Novelty Detection in Underwater Acoustic Environments for Maritime Surveillance Using an Out-of-Distribution Detector for Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reliable detection of unknown signals is essential for ensuring the robustness of underwater acoustic sensing systems, particularly in maritime security and autonomous navigation. However, Conventional deep learning models often exhibit overconfidence when encountering unknown signals and are unable to quantify predictive uncertainty due to their deterministic inference process. To address these limitations, this study proposes a novelty detection framework that integrates an out-of-distribution detector for neural networks (ODIN) with Monte Carlo (MC) dropout. ODIN mitigates model overconfidence and enhances the separability between known and unknown signals through softmax probability calibration, while MC dropout introduces stochasticity via multiple forward passes to estimate predictive uncertainty-an element critical for stable sensing in real-world underwater environments. The resulting probabilistic outputs are modeled using Gaussian mixture models fitted to ODIN-calibrated softmax distributions of known classes. The Kullback-Leibler divergence is then employed to quantify deviations of test samples from known class behavior. Experimental evaluations on the DeepShip dataset demonstrate that the proposed method achieves, on average, a 9.5% and 5.39% increase in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and a 7.82% and 2.63% reduction in false positive rate at 95% true positive rate, compared to the MC dropout and ODIN baseline, respectively. These results confirm that integrating stochastic inference with ODIN significantly enhances the stability and reliability of novelty detection in underwater acoustic environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".