MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116913937 · doi:10.1139/cjz-2025-0068

Characterization of Dall’s sheep ( <i>Ovis dalli dalli</i> ) post-lambing habitat in Kluane National Park and Reserve based on four decades of population monitoring

2025· article· en· W7116913937 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Mary Anne Schoenhardt, Carmen Wong, Ryan K. Danby

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsParks CanadaQueen's University
FundersQueen's UniversityWeston Family FoundationPolar Knowledge Canada
KeywordsHabitatNational parkOvisPopulationVegetation (pathology)Aerial surveyElevation (ballistics)TerrainGlacial period

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long-term monitoring data are valuable for providing an understanding of habitat consistently used by a species. We used annual aerial survey data collected since 1977 on Dall’s sheep ( Ovis dalli dalli Nelson, 1884) in Kluane National Park and Reserve, Yukon, to describe habitat use by sheep at two spatial scales during the post-lambing period. We used kernel density estimation to map sheep habitat use, followed by random forest modelling with topographic predictor variables to characterize terrain features used most by sheep. Elevation and distance to glacial ice were the two strongest predictors of habitat use, with the most frequently used areas characterized by mid to high elevations not directly adjacent to glacial ice. Relationships differed minimally between ram and nursery groups, suggesting that sexual segregation is due to behaviour and not terrain preference. Kernel density estimation was also used to stratify selection of sites for vegetation surveys to characterize habitat use at a finer scale. Areas used most frequently by sheep were comprised of relatively low growing vegetation. The results provide knowledge useful for management of this iconic species in a rapidly changing environment while demonstrating the value of long-term monitoring data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Zoology→Same topicWildlife Ecology and Conservation→French-language works237,207→