MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116915278 · doi:10.1002/alz70862_110868

Tracking structural changes in preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer’s disease: insights from amyloid‐beta pathology

2025· article· en· W7116915278 on OpenAlexaff
Ting Qiu, Zhen‐Qi Liu, Jonathan Gallego Rudolf, Manon Edde, Alex Valcourt Caron, Yuanchao Zhang, Jean‐Paul Soucy, R. Nathan Spreng, Alexa Pichet Binette, Maxime Descôteaux, Sylvia Villeneuve

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsAlzheimer Society of CanadaUniversité de MontréalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de MontréalMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalUniversité de SherbrookeMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogliaNeuroimagingDiseaseTracking (education)Stage (stratigraphy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Amyloid‐beta (Aβ) and tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is commonly associated with disruptions in grey matter integrity, including reduced cortical thickness (CT) and increased cortical mean diffusivity (MD). However, some cross‐sectional studies have also reported an increase in CT during the preclinical stage of the disease. Using over 10 years of longitudinal neuroimaging data from the PREVENT‐AD cohort, we examined the association between AD pathology (Aβ and tau) and brain structure, measured by CT, free‐water corrected MD (MD T ), and hippocampal volume. We also estimated the longitudinal trajectories of structural changes along the Aβ positivity timeline across the preclinical and prodromal stages of AD. Method We performed partial least square analyses (PLS) separately for Aβ negative (Aβ−) and Aβ positive (Aβ+) groups to identify key brain regions that contributed to pathological‐structural associations. We then assessed the cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations between AD pathology and structural measures within the PLS‐identified regions across all participants. Using the sampled iterative local approximation algorithm, we estimated the time from Aβ+ onset and calculated years from Aβ+ for each MRI scan. These estimates allowed us to track the structural changes relative to Aβ positivity (Figure 1). Result We found that higher Aβ deposition was associated with decreased MD T and increased CT in the Aβ− group, whereas the Aβ+ group showed opposite associations. Across all participants, associations for MD T followed a U‐shaped pattern, while CT exhibited an inverse U‐shaped relationship with Aβ pathology (Figure 2). These associations were observed in several key AD‐related regions, including the entorhinal cortex, fusiform gyrus, and inferior parietal lobule, and middle temporal regions. Longitudinal analyses revealed similar trajectory patterns along the Aβ+ timeline, with these changes emerging several years before Aβ positivity onset (Figure 3). Conclusion Our study suggests that brain structural changes in response to Aβ pathology start decades before symptoms and may follow highly nonlinear trajectories. The initial increases in CT and decreases in MD T might be related to the space taken by Aβ and/or several other biological processes occurring during the preclinical stage of the disease, such as neuroinflammation, astrocytic and microglia activation, or brain swelling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→