MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116915797 · doi:10.1002/alz70862_109800

<i>Comprehensive Neuroimaging Analysis Experience In Resource Constrained settings (CONNExIN): An Approach to Advance Dementia Neuroimaging Training in LMICs</i>

2025· article· en· W7116915797 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ethan C Draper, Jasmine D. Cakmak, Kesavi Kanagasabai, Aduluwa Harrison, Alfonso Fajardo, Oluwateniola Akinwale, Cristián Montalba, Jonathan Gallego Rudolf, Channelle Tham, Guy Poloni, Jackline Thairu, Njideka Okubadejo, Fatade Abiodun, Sheila Waa, Thomas Thesen, Chinedu Udeh‐Momoh, Farouk Dako, Udunna Anazodo

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)Western UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroimagingDementiaTraining (meteorology)Functional neuroimagingAlzheimer's disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are established imaging technologies for dementia management in both clinical (e.g., diagnosis) and research (e.g., identifying biomarkers) settings. Though still far below global rates, access to PET and MRI in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is improving. However, there remains a dearth of research personnel in LMICs trained to use neuroimaging data for research. METHOD: CONNExIN (COmprehensive Neuroimaging aNalysis Experience In resource constraiNed settings) is a hybrid initiative led by Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, in collaboration with AFRICA-FINGERS [1], and the Consortium for Advancement of MRI Education and Research in Africa (CAMERA) [2]. CONNExIN [3] implements RAD-AID's Teach-Try-Use strategy, previously applied by CAMERA to improve MRI and PET analysis competencies through seminars and hands-on skills development [4] (Figure 1). Multi-scanner (0.55T, 1.5T, and 3T) brain MRI data were acquired on seven healthy volunteers at six sites including at AFRICA-FINGERS sites (Lagos and Nairobi) and used strictly for training (Table 1). RESULT: This 16-week program began on August 26th, 2024 (Figure 1). Following three weeks of self-paced virtual content and weekend tutorials, 34 African students and clinicians from 6 countries completed a hybrid bootcamp. The one-week bootcamp included on-site training hosted at Crestview Radiology (Lagos, Nigeria) and Aga Khan University (Nairobi, Kenya) and virtual participation. Participants analyzed local (Table 1) and open-access brain scans (PREVENT-AD) [5] in groups, self-selecting one of six modalities (i.e., MRI and PET). At the end of the program in December 2024, a total of 120 hours of no-cost neuroimaging analysis and dementia research training was provided including design, implementation, and dissemination. Participants are currently being guided on science communication through drafting and submitting conference abstracts including to AAIC. All training materials will be shared on protocols.io for wider dissemination. CONCLUSION: CONNExIN is training a cohort to analyze neuroimaging data and become local experts who can train others, thereby improving dementia imaging research capacity in LMICs. [1] Udeh-Momoh CT, et al. Alzheimers Dement. 2024 [2] https://www.cameramriafrica.org/ [3] event.fourwaves.com/connexin [4] Mumuni AN, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2024 [5] Tremblay-Mercier J, et al. Neuroimage Clin. 2021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→