Estimation of the degree of decomposition of peat and past net primary production from mid-infrared spectra
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The degree of decomposition of peat (γ) is useful to understand peatland degradation and peat accumulation, to reconstruct past net primary production (NPP), and to improve peatland models. None of the available decomposition indicators allows to estimate γ with sufficient accuracy. We suggest prediction of γ measured in litterbag experiments from mid-infrared spectra (MIRS) as a novel decomposition indicator, γMIRS, and compute prediction models for γMIRS with available litterbag experiments and litter data from diverse species from the Peatland Mid-Infrared Database. For individual litter samples, the prediction models fit the data well, have reasonable prediction errors (average RMSE between 0.09 and 0.12 g g−1), and neither confound differences in litter chemistry nor differences in silicate contents with decomposition losses. We show that an underestimation of γ by γMIRS matches theoretical expectations; it can therefore be compensated, using plant macrofossil analysis data as a first approximation to mass fractions of peat components and a simple mixing model, or it can be avoided with component-specific measurements instead of bulk measurements. This allows to estimate γ of peat samples and of dominant litter types and therefore also to reconstruct past NPP. To illustrate the approach, we analyze three cores from European mountain bogs and discuss how it can be used to improve process models and support restoration of peatlands. In particular, we test previously suggested relations between the saturated hydraulic conductivity and γ, illustrate how γ measured on individual litter types may allow to use peat cores as natural litterbag experiments, and define reference states for γ and NPP for the three analyzed peat cores. Improvements to reduce prediction errors of the approach require more diverse litterbag data, especially woody species and more decomposed litter. Further improvements can be achieved with measurements of MIRS on individual macrofossil types instead of bulk measurements, and an improved estimation of mass fractions of macrofossil types in peat samples instead of assuming that macrofossil abundances equal macrofossil masses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".