MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116917186 · doi:10.1002/alz70861_108032

Double Burden of Mild Behavioural Impairment and Frailty – Implications for Quality of Life and Cognition in a Southeast Asian Cohort

2025· article· en· W7116917186 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ming Hui, Colin Goh, Yi Jin Leow, Pricilia Tanoto, Nagaendran Kandiah

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApathyCognitionQuality of life (healthcare)CohortCognitive declineCognitive impairmentDementia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: While the independent associations of Mild Behavioural Impairment (MBI) and frailty with Quality of Life (QoL) and cognitive outcomes have been independently studied, their combined effects remain less understood, particularly in Southeast Asian populations. METHOD: Cross-sectional analysis of 1,500 participants from the Biomarkers and Cognition Study, Singapore (BIOCIS), including cognitively normal, subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia. Behavioural symptoms were assessed using the Mild Behavioural Impairment Checklist (MBI-C), with a cut-off score ≥5.5 indicating significant symptoms (MBI+). Frailty was defined by the Fried Frailty Phenotype, with ≥1 criterion indicating frailty (Frail+). Quality of Life (QoL) was measured via the Dementia Quality of Life Questionnaire (DEMQoL), global cognition with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and domain-specific cognition (episodic memory, executive function, language, processing speed, visuospatial) using aggregated z-scores from standardised tests. Multiple linear regression models examined the effects of MBI-C Total and domain scores, as well as frailty, on DEMQoL, controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, years of education, ApoE4 status, marital status, employment status, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, and cognitive status. Stepwise regression was used to explore combined effects of MBI-C domains and frailty. Participants were cross-classified into four MBI/frailty groups, and cognitive outcomes (MoCA and domain-specific z-scores) were compared using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with Tukey Post-Hoc tests. RESULT: Higher MBI-C Score correlated with poorer DEMQoL (β=-6.2; p <0.001). MBI-C-domains emotional dysregulation (β=-9.4; p <0.001), impulsivity (β=-7.0; p <0.001), and apathy (β=-8.6; p <0.001) were associated with poorer QoL than frailty (β=-2.2; p <0.001). Individuals with both MBI and Frailty demonstrated the poorest cognitive performance across all domains (p <0.001) except visuospatial (p <0.05). CONCLUSION: Emotional dysregulation, impulsivity, and apathy are associated with substantially poorer QoL. Co-occurrence of MBI and frailty are associated with a greater cognitive decline than either condition alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicFrailty in Older Adults→French-language works237,207→