MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116926426 · doi:10.1002/alz70860_096487

Loneliness and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: A Cross‐Sectional Study in Ghana

2025· article· en· W7116926426 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel Naawenkangua Abukuri

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLonelinessDementiaCognitive impairmentCognitionPsychological interventionRisk factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Loneliness is an emerging public health concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), driven by urbanization and shifting social dynamics. Evidence suggests loneliness may increase the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a precursor to dementia. However, limited research exists on this association in LMICs, particularly in Ghana. This study investigates the relationship between loneliness and MCI among older adults in Ghana, aiming to inform dementia prevention strategies. METHOD: This cross-sectional study will be conducted in urban and rural Ghana, involving 300 participants aged 60 and above. Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and loneliness will be measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Data on sociodemographic factors (e.g., age, gender, living arrangements) will be collected. Multiple regression analysis will be used to examine the association between loneliness and MCI, controlling for confounders like physical health and socioeconomic status. RESULT: Preliminary findings reveal a significant link between loneliness and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Of 300 participants, 45% (n = 135) reported moderate to severe loneliness, and 38% (n = 114) were diagnosed with MCI, with 55 participants experiencing both conditions. Those with moderate to severe loneliness had nearly double the risk of cognitive decline compared to less lonely individuals (Odds Ratio: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.4-2.7, p < 0.05). Further analysis showed that 80 participants reported loneliness without MCI, while 59 had MCI but low loneliness, and 106 neither reported loneliness nor MCI. Physical health and social support influenced cognitive outcomes but did not weaken the loneliness-MCI association (adjusted β coefficient = 0.62, p = 0.03). Qualitative data supported these results, highlighting memory lapses, reduced focus, and diminished problem-solving skills among lonely participants. CONCLUSION: Loneliness is a key risk factor for MCI in Ghana, independent of other variables. Addressing loneliness through community-based interventions may help prevent cognitive decline and reduce dementia risk. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore underlying mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicHealth disparities and outcomes→French-language works237,207→