MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116928758 · doi:10.1080/02786826.2025.2596076

Slip flow and shadowing effects in multilayered fibrous filter media

2025· article· en· W7116928758 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean‐Michel Tucny, Sébastien Leclaire, François Bertrand, David Vidal

Bibliographic record

VenueAerosol Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSlip (aerodynamics)Filter (signal processing)Flow (mathematics)Aerosol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Air filtration devices, including N95 facemasks and HEPA filters are often made of a small amount of nanofibers deposited on a layer of microfibers using techniques like melt-blowing or electrospinning. This multilayered structure enhances filter performance, mechanical properties, lifespans and cost efficiencies. At the surface of nanofibers, rarefied gas effects such as gas slippage, reduce pressure drop and increases capture efficiency. However, the influence of flow disturbances between fibers in multilayered filter media on filtration performance in the slip regime remains understudied. In this paper, direct numerical simulations of slip flows through three-dimensional digitalized filter media were carried out using a new lattice Boltzmann method. Results show that as the Knudsen number increases, flow redistributes from large pores to small pores, reducing pressure drop and increasing capture efficiency. Flow visualization revealed a shadowing effect exerted by coarse fibers on adjacent fine fibers, which increases the pressure drop caused by microfibers within the multilayered structure compared to their isolated counterparts. While the contribution of this flow shading to filter performance was measurable (5%), the impact of slip flow on the quality factor was far more substantial (80%).Copyright © 2026 American Association for Aerosol Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAerosol Science and TechnologySame topicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationFrench-language works237,207