MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116931505 · doi:10.5061/dryad.9kd51c5x7

Data and code from: Sea ice perturbation and mass starvation of Thick-billed Murres

2025· dataset· en· W7116931505 on OpenAlexaffabout
A. D. Day, Tori V. Burt, Sydney M. Collins, Christopher R. E. Ward, Sabina I. Wilhelm, Frédéric Cyr, Meghan A. Baker, William Montevecchi

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaGovernment of Newfoundland and LabradorMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForagingStarvationPectoral muscleDemographicsFish <Actinopterygii>Sea ice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During spring 2022, thousands of Thick-billed Murres (Uria lomvia) died on the southern Labrador and northeastern Newfoundland coasts. Location and timing of the event were compiled from public sources, including social media and institutions. Some retained carcasses were dissected and compared to healthy birds. The rapid-onset, five-week event lasted from March 18 to April 25, 2022, emanating from an impact site in southern Labrador. Extreme winds compacted and reduced sea ice area, which exposed sub-zero water temperatures and limited feeding options. Dissections were performed to determine body condition and demographics of birds affected. Neither sex nor age was associated with mortality, and a subset of carcasses tested negative for influenza A. Carcass masses averaged 65.5 % of the body mass of healthy birds, indicative of a threshold for stage III starvation (protein catabolism). Photographs and measurements showed significant pectoral muscle wasting, and pectoral mass was less than that of healthy birds. The probable cause of the die-off is starvation accelerated by a rapid drop in water temperature and limited foraging options driven by a sea-ice perturbation. Ocean-climatic variability and extreme events are expected to increase, posing challenges for polar seabirds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→