MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116951565 · doi:10.3390/electronics15010058

FPGA-Based Dual Learning Model for Wheel Speed Sensor Fault Detection in ABS Systems Using HIL Simulations

2025· article· en· W7116951565 on OpenAlexafffund
Farshideh Kordi, Paul Fortier, Amine Miled

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFault detection and isolationReliability (semiconductor)Dual (grammatical number)BrakeSet (abstract data type)Fault (geology)Resilience (materials science)Braking system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid evolution of modern vehicles into intelligent and interconnected systems presents new complexities in both functional safety and cybersecurity. In this context, ensuring the reliability and integrity of critical sensor data, such as wheel speed inputs for anti-lock brake systems (ABS), is essential. Effective detection of wheel speed sensor faults not only improves functional safety, but also plays a vital role in keeping system resilience against potential cyber–physical threats. Although data-driven approaches have gained popularity for system development due to their ability to extract meaningful patterns from historical data, a major limitation is the lack of diverse and representative faulty datasets. This study proposes a novel dual learning model, based on Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN), designed to accurately distinguish between normal and faulty wheel speed sensor behavior within a hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) simulation platform implemented on an FPGA. To address dataset limitations, a TruckSim–MATLAB/Simulink co-simulation environment is used to generate realistic datasets under normal operation and eight representative fault scenarios, yielding up to 5000 labeled sequences (balanced between normal and faulty behaviors) at a sampling rate of 60 Hz. Two TCN models are trained independently to learn normal and faulty dynamics, and fault decisions are made by comparing the reconstruction errors (MSE and MAE) of both models, thus avoiding manually tuned thresholds. On a test set of 1000 sequences (500 normal and 500 faulty) from the 5000 sample configuration, the proposed dual TCN framework achieves a detection accuracy of 97.8%, a precision of 96.5%, a recall of 98.2%, and an F1-score of 97.3%, outperforming a single TCN baseline, which achieves 91.4% accuracy and an 88.9% F1-score. The complete dual TCN architecture is implemented on a Xilinx ZCU102 FPGA evaluation kit (AMD, Santa Clara, CA, USA), while supporting real-time inference in the HIL loop. These results demonstrate that the proposed approach provides accurate, low-latency fault detection suitable for safety-critical ABS applications and contributes to improving both functional safety and cyber-resilience of braking systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronicsSame topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207