MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116951869 · doi:10.1109/tgcn.2025.3647528

Energy-Efficient 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul Open RAN-Based Fixed Wireless Access Provisioning in Rural Areas

2025· article· W7116951869 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anselme Ndikumana, Kim Thịnh Nguyễn, Mohamed Cheriet

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBackhaul (telecommunications)ProvisioningCloud computingInteroperabilityRenewable energyWirelessEnergy consumptionInternet accessRadio access network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) has emerged as a promising solution for providing Internet access to rural areas where fiber deployment is not economically feasible. Recently, 5G-based FWA has been demonstrated to offer high coverage and capacity using mid and high-frequency bands. However, these bands require more radio units to increase capacity and coverage. Additionally, 5G-based FWA necessitates the deployment of edge clouds for proximity computation and hosting network functions. However, deploying more radios and leveraging edge cloud infrastructure can increase the network’s energy consumption. Therefore, such 5G-based FWA should be designed and powered by renewable energy to be sustainable and cost-efficient in rural areas. To address these challenges, we propose energy-efficient 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul Open Radio Access Network-based FWA (5G IAB and Open RAN-based FWA) serving rural areas, where Open RAN supports the interoperability of 5G-based FWA elements. We design an energy model that leverages the power grid and renewable energy to serve IAB and Open RAN-based FWA.We join the communication model with the energy model. Then, we formulate a joint optimization problem to minimize energy consumption while maximizing communication utility. We propose concave programming and disciplined convex programming as solutions. The results show that our approach can increase network and energy utility by leveraging renewable energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Green Communications and NetworkingSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207