MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116954435 · doi:10.1109/twc.2025.3644918

Physically-Consistent Modeling and Optimization of Non-Local RIS-Assisted Multi-User MISO Systems

2025· article· W7116954435 on OpenAlexaff
Dilki Wijekoon, Amine Mezghani, George Alexandropoulos, Ekram Hossain

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)WirelessChannel (broadcasting)Parametric statisticsOptimization problemFeature (linguistics)Coupling (piping)Parametric model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mutual Coupling (MC) emerges as an inherent feature in Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface (RIS) structures, particularly when they are fabricated with sub-wavelength inter-element spacing. Hence, their realistic modeling and efficient optimization need to accurately incorporate MC-induced effects. In addition, the design of electromagnetics-compliant transmit/receive radiation patterns constitutes another critical factor for efficient RIS operation. These radiation patterns together with MC naturally lead to the emergence of non-local RIS structures, whose operation can be effectively described via non-diagonal phase configuration matrices. In this paper, we present a physically-consistent joint optimization framework for the MC and the radiation patterns of non-local RIS structures for the case of RIS-assisted multi-user Multiple-Input Single-Output (MISO) communication systems. Both conventional reflective as well as transmissive RIS setups are considered. Assuming the availability of statistical properties of the wireless environment for the targeted RIS deployment, we particularly devise a novel offline optimization approach for the static scattering S-parameters of the RIS, which is followed by a dynamic, per-channel-realization optimization of the metasurface’s response-tunable elements and the transmitter’s active precoder. Our extensive simulation results, using both parametric and geometric channel models, showcase the validity of the proposed two-step optimization framework over benchmark schemes, indicating that improved performance can be achievable without the need for optimizing the MC and the radiation patterns of the RIS on the fly, which can be rather cumbersome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207