MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116954631 · doi:10.1002/alz70860_098142

Interplay between sleep and exercise in older adults at increased risk of Alzheimer disease and related dementias

2025· article· en· W7116954631 on OpenAlexaff
Connor Snow, Sophie Berghmans, Quinn Smith, Alison Donald, Matiram Pun, Shane Magnison‐Benoit, Jean M. Rawling, Jessalyn K. Holodinsky, Stewart Longman, Marc J. Poulin

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleep (system call)CognitionAlzheimer's diseaseDiseaseDementiaCognitive declineSleep architectureAerobic exerciseRelevance (law)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRD) are a global concern, with major personal and socio-economic impacts. Physical inactivity and poor sleep are important modifiable risk factors for ADRD and addressing these factors could reduce the prevalence of dementia by up to 40%. For example, poor sleepers have a 1.6-fold higher risk of developing AD but how do we define poor sleep, what components of sleep are relevant, by how much can sleep quality be improved and what effect does improving sleep have on brain health? Equally, what types of physical activity improve brain health and sleep quality, and what are the relative magnitudes of effect? We will present data demonstrating the association between poor sleep and impaired cognition, and the beneficial effects of aerobic exercise on sleep and cognition in older adults at increased risk of ADRD. METHODS: peak) and cognition (overall composite, domains) data from two cohorts: BIM-I is a prospective cohort study of older sedentary adults with longitudinal assessments over a long term (5-7 years) follow-up. The second cohort is from the BIM-II randomized controlled trial involving aerobic exercise in older adults at increased risk of ADRD. Data from BIM-II examines the inter-relationship between exercise, sleep and cognition. RESULTS: Data from BIM-I and II demonstrate: 1) compared to younger adults, older adults have a significant reduction in deep (i.e., slow wave) sleep, an increase in transitional sleep and more wakefulness during sleep; 2) evidence of sex differences in sleep and in exercise effects on sleep; and 3) aerobic exercise is more effective than stretch and tone exercise to improve sleep quality, cognition, and cerebrovascular health. CONCLUSIONS: The novel cross-sectional, interventional and longitudinal data emerging from BIM-I and BIM-II in community dwelling & non-clinical populations provide evidence supporting age-related declines in sleep architecture and improvements in sleep with aerobic exercise, as well as a complex interplay between sleep, exercise and cognition in older adults at increased risk of ADRD. These findings help advance knowledge of how lifestyle modifications maintain brain and cognitive health with aging, with relevance to prevention of ADRD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicSleep and related disorders→French-language works237,207→