MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116957977 · doi:10.1109/jsac.2025.3647416

Low Earth Orbit Satellite (LEOS)-Assisted Integrated Access and Backhauling in xG Wireless Communication: A Generalizable RL Framework

2025· article· W7116957977 on OpenAlexaff
Fahime Khoramnejad, Ekram Hossain

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackhaul (telecommunications)Reinforcement learningWirelessInvariant (physics)Base stationHypergraphEmbeddingControl reconfiguration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In next-generation (xG) wireless communication networks, developing generalizable learning models that inherently adapt to diverse conditions is crucial. This paper proposes a reinforcement learning (RL) framework for subchannel (SC) allocation in low Earth orbit satellite (LEOS)-assisted integrated access and backhauling (IAB) networks. We consider an integrated terrestrial-satellite network, where a LEOS provides backhaul services to cellular base stations (BSs) in remote areas while forwarding data from mobile user equipments (UEs) to the core network. The objective is to maximize the achievable rate for UEs while satisfying demand requirements and backhaul constraints. To ensure generalizable and efficient SC allocation across environments, we formulate the resource management problem as an invariant policy learning framework, which is decomposed into two subproblems: state representation learning and policy optimization. Our approach learns state representations that remain invariant across diverse environments. Additionally, the invariant policy, obtained from the hypergraph output layer, captures the fundamental causes of successful actions, enabling robust decision-making. By embedding problem constraints into both the model architecture and the training objective, the framework enhances the transparency of the invariant policy optimization process. Furthermore, we derive a data-dependent generalization bound that characterizes the policy’s performance in unseen environments. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed policy consistently outperforms traditional methods across multiple environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in CommunicationsSame topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207