MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116962518 · doi:10.1002/alz70861_108898

Multi‐echo resting state fMRI processing of the PREVENT‐AD cohort: an open science initiative

2025· article· en· W7116962518 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mohammadali Javanray, Alexandre Pastor‐Bernier, Jordana Remz, Jennifer Tremblay‐Mercier, Alexa Pichet Binette, Bellec Pierre, Sylvia Villeneuve

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de MontréalDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill UniversityAlzheimer Society of CanadaUniversité de MontréalMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResting state fMRIProcess (computing)State (computer science)Independent component analysisNoise reductionOpen dataDecision treeOpen science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: PREVENT-AD is launching a second wave of open science data sharing, offering neuroimaging derivatives including resting-state multi-echo functional MRI (ME-fMRI) from 348 older adults with a family history of Alzheimer's disease (AD), who were cognitively healthy at enrolment, and followed for up to 13 years. ME-fMRI improves the separation of BOLD and non-BOLD signals, and processing pipelines are being optimized to process these data. To process the PREVENT-AD ME-fMRI data for the open science initiative, several strategies were evaluated, and the best-performing approach was selected. METHOD: A total of 666 ME-fMRI scans from 300 participants were acquired using a 3T SIEMENS MAGNETOM Prisma_fit scanner at the Cerebral Imaging Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute (Montreal, Canada). Scans were minimally preprocessed with fMRIPrep. Dummy volumes were removed from both the optimally combined images and each single-echo image. Data were then denoised using tedana's independent component analysis (ICA)-based approach (Figure 1), applying four different decision trees: default, meica, minimal, and minimal with external regressors. The optimal decision tree was selected based on 1) retaining at least 10 BOLD components per run, 2) maximizing variance explained by BOLD components, 3) favorable spatial and temporal profiles of components, and 4) preserving as many runs as possible. RESULT: On average, tedana ICA retained 50.0 total number of components (SD = 13.5). The minimal and minimal_external_regressors trees led to the exclusion of 54 and 124 runs, respectively, failing the 10-BOLD component criterion. The meica tree retained the highest number of BOLD components, with an average of 24.6 (SD = 7.6), but accepted components that were rejected by the default tree (Table 1). These additional components exhibited spatial and temporal profiles indicative of noise (Figure 1). The default decision tree yielded the second highest average number of retained BOLD components (22; SD = 7.1) (Figure 2), and did not discard any runs. CONCLUSION: The tedana ICA denoising using the default decision tree retained an appropriate number of components while effectively identifying and rejecting noise-related components and preserving sessions. Therefore, this approach was selected to process the PREVENT-AD cohort ME-fMRI data for open science data sharing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→