PERIODICAL PRESS MATERIALS OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 19TH CENTURY AND EARLY 20th CENTURY ABOUT THE HISTORY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF THE KAZAN EDUCATIONAL DISTRICT IN DISSERTATIONS ON SCIENTIFIC SPECIALTY “NATIONAL HISTORY” OF THE EARLY 21st CENTURY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction. The topics of scientific and qualification works of the beginning of the 21st century reflect a multifactorial approach to the study of Russian regional history. The history of primary public education remains a relevant direction of Russian historiography. Methods and materials. The article uses historical-statistical and historical-comparative methods to analyze historical abstracts of dissertations and dissertations in which periodical press materials are classified as the main types of sources. Analysis and results. The territorial scope of the scientific and qualification works covers the entire territory of the Kazan educational district, and the chronological one is mainly the second half of the 19th to early 20th centuries. A quarter of all authors addressed a wide range of periodicals, but their dissertations demonstrate a superficial analysis of the periodical press, limiting them to listing the contents of publications. Only a fifth of the researchers addressed periodicals at the district level. Regional periodicals were used on an equal basis with central ones, but in terms of the number of newspaper and magazine titles, they were several times inferior to the latter. They used periodical press materials in four main areas of scientific research: taking into account public opinion, studying the chronology of events, preparing interdisciplinary studies, and supplementing other types of sources. An analysis of dissertations showed that the potential of the periodical press (central, regional, and local) as a comprehensive historical source on the history is underutilized. The diversity of the central and regional periodical press of the Kazan district has resource potential in modern scientific research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".