MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116966263 · doi:10.15688/jvolsu4.2025.5.5

PERIODICAL PRESS MATERIALS OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 19TH CENTURY AND EARLY 20th CENTURY ABOUT THE HISTORY OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF THE KAZAN EDUCATIONAL DISTRICT IN DISSERTATIONS ON SCIENTIFIC SPECIALTY “NATIONAL HISTORY” OF THE EARLY 21st CENTURY

2025· article· W7116966263 on OpenAlex
Nadezhda Archebasova

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Serija 4 Istorija Regionovedenie Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPsycholinguistics and Behavioral Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperListing (finance)Scope (computer science)Quarter (Canadian coin)Periodical literatureLimitingPeriod (music)Diversity (politics)Comparative historical research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. The topics of scientific and qualification works of the beginning of the 21st century reflect a multifactorial approach to the study of Russian regional history. The history of primary public education remains a relevant direction of Russian historiography. Methods and materials. The article uses historical-statistical and historical-comparative methods to analyze historical abstracts of dissertations and dissertations in which periodical press materials are classified as the main types of sources. Analysis and results. The territorial scope of the scientific and qualification works covers the entire territory of the Kazan educational district, and the chronological one is mainly the second half of the 19th to early 20th centuries. A quarter of all authors addressed a wide range of periodicals, but their dissertations demonstrate a superficial analysis of the periodical press, limiting them to listing the contents of publications. Only a fifth of the researchers addressed periodicals at the district level. Regional periodicals were used on an equal basis with central ones, but in terms of the number of newspaper and magazine titles, they were several times inferior to the latter. They used periodical press materials in four main areas of scientific research: taking into account public opinion, studying the chronology of events, preparing interdisciplinary studies, and supplementing other types of sources. An analysis of dissertations showed that the potential of the periodical press (central, regional, and local) as a comprehensive historical source on the history is underutilized. The diversity of the central and regional periodical press of the Kazan district has resource potential in modern scientific research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.011
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it