MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116974940 · doi:10.22323/1.500.0063

QCD sum rule study on the charmonium-like states with the exotic quantum number $J^{PC} = 3^{-+}$

2025· article· W7116974940 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hongzhou Xi, Hua-Xing Chen, Wei Chen, T.G. Steele, Yong Zhang, Dan Zhou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTetraquarkCovariant transformationQCD sum rulesQuantum chromodynamicsQuantum numberQuantumState (computer science)Exotic hadron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate charmonium-like tetraquark states with the exotic quantum number \( J^{PC} = 3^{-+} \) using QCD sum rules, and obtain the mass of the lowest-lying state to be \( 4.49^{+0.45}_{-0.41} \)~GeV. The construction of relevant tetraquark currents necessitates the explicit introduction of the covariant derivative operator. Our systematic analysis of these interpolating currents reveals the following decay properties: (a) the state readily decays into the \( P \)-wave channels \( [\rho J/\psi] \) and \( [\omega J/\psi] \), but not into the \( [\rho \chi_{c2}] \), \( [\omega \chi_{c2}] \), or \( [J/\psi f_2(1270)] \) channels; and (b) it also decays readily into the \( [D^* \bar{D}_2^*] \) channel, but not into the \( P \)-wave \( [D^* \bar{D}^*] \) channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207