MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116975664 · doi:10.1002/alz70861_108465

Retinal Deposits of TDP‐43 and Amyloid Beta and Associated Neurodegenerative Diseases are Accurately Classified using Measured Interactions with Polarized Light in Machine Learning Algorithms

2025· article· en· W7116975664 on OpenAlexaff
Melanie C. W. Campbell, Lyndsy Acheson, Erik Mason, Tanya Hareesha Shetty, Laura Emptage, Rachel Redekop, Monika Kitor, Ian R. Mackenzie, Naomi Catie Futhey, Veronica Hirsch‐Reinshagen, Ging‐Yuek Robin Hsiung

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetinalBETA (programming language)DiseaseDifferential (mechanical device)Support vector machineAmyloid (mycology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: We have shown that interactions with polarized light differed significantly between retinal amyloid beta deposits, associated with Alzheimer's disease, and deposits of TDP-43 found in the neurodegenerative diseases Frontotemporal Lobular Dementia (FTLD) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). Our non-invasive retinal imaging could be the first differential diagnostic of these neurodegenerative diseases. Here, the deposits' polarized light interactions are used in machine learning to classify the deposits. METHOD: Post-mortem eyes and brains were obtained from 2 individuals with ALS, 1 of whom also had FTLD, and 4 individuals with FTLD, including 1 with Type C. Brain TDP-43 was present in the FTLD cases and some had age-related tau. Flat-mounted retinas were imaged using a polarimeter and then in thioflavin fluorescence. 270 presumed amyloid beta deposits in 10 individuals who had brain amyloid beta and tau and a moderate to high likelihood of AD, and 138 presumed TDP-43 deposits in those with FTLD and/or ALS were imaged. In 1 individual with concurrent low values of brain amyloid and 1 with FTLD-Type C, only thioflavin negative deposits were classed as potential TDP-43 deposits. Interactions of polarized light with deposits were analyzed. Random forest (RF), an ensemble learning method and convolutional neural networks (CNN), were then used to differentiate amyloid beta from TDP-43 deposits. RESULT: The deposit means and/or standard deviations of nine different polarized light interactions were significantly different between the presumed TDP-43 retinal deposits, found in ALS and FTLD, and amyloid deposits found in AD. With borderline SMOTE augmentation of the data, we achieved a classification accuracy of 86.5± 0.6% using random forest, utilizing 6 of these interactions. CNN achieved a classification accuracy of >96% accuracy using images of the distributions of 3 polarimetric properties. CONCLUSION: Machine learning, using the averages and standard deviations of polarized light properties in RF or images showing the distribution of these properties across the deposits (CNN) can differentiate retinal deposits associated with Alzheimer's disease from those associated with ALS and FTLD, with a relatively high accuracy. This first differential diagnostic of Alzheimer's disease from TDP-43 related diseases, is early, non-invasive and inexpensive and would reach underserved populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies→French-language works237,207→