MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116983403 · doi:10.1002/alz70862_110297

User‐friendly tools for tau PET harmonization in clinical trials: The Uniτ Ecosystem

2025· article· en· W7116983403 on OpenAlexaff
Guilherme Povala, Guilherme Bauer‐Negrini, Bruna Bellaver, Pamela C.L. Ferreira, Lívia Amaral, Firoza Z Lussier, Dana Tudorascu, Quentin Finn, Joseph C. Masdeu, David Soleimani‐Meigooni, Juan M. Fortea, Val J. Lowe, Hwamee Oh, Belén Pascual, Brian A. Gordon, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Suzanne L. Baker, Tharick A. Pascoal

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcosystemHarmonizationEcosystem approachContext (archaeology)Positron emission tomography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: HEAD is a longitudinal, multi-site, non-randomized study aiming to harmonize different tau PET tracers onto a common scale for enrichment and monitoring of anti-tau clinical trials. To achieve this, the Uniτ scale is being developed using data from participants scanned head-to-head with Flortaucipir and MK6240, with a subset also scanned with PI2620 and RO948. However, access to the Uniτ scale has been limited to the study community and collaborators. To address this limitation, we have developed the Uniτ Ecosystem - a set of tools for tau PET harmonization designed to support research and clinical trials (www.unitau.app). METHOD: The Uniτ Ecosystem was developed for multiple operating systems (Web/macOS/Windows/Ubuntu) (Figure 1) and currently include four tools. The Uniτ harmonization is an online ROI harmonization module that allows the user to harmonize SUVRs from spreadsheets. The Uniτ packages (R, Python and MATLAB) facilitates the transformation of SUVR values to the Uniτ scale using the most used programming languages in research settings. The Uniτ calculator app allows rapid and convenient harmonization. The Uniτ desktop app is a 3D harmonization module for voxel-wise harmonization. The Uniτ parameters were calculated using a training set of 200 participants with head-to-head MK6240 and Flortaucipir, and 90 individuals with additional PI2620 and RO948. Researchers can use their own datasets and convert tau PET data to the Uniτ scale. RESULT: The online ROI harmonization module allows users to harmonize tau PET SUVRs uploaded from spreadsheets and offers interactive visualizations such as scatter plots and histograms for tau positivity thresholds (Figure 2). The calculator app enables users to harmonize single SUVR values effortlessly. The desktop application for 3D tau PET harmonization leverages the functionalities of the previous modules to harmonize entire 3D images, eliminating the need for predefined ROIs. Additionally, this module provides visualization tools for the parametric Uniτ images in 2D and 3D (Figure 3). Uniτ tools never store any data on any external servers. CONCLUSION: The Uniτ Ecosystem represents a significant advance in tau PET harmonization, providing a user-friendly platform to harmonize and visualize tau PET data for research and clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.034
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.094
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0340.094
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0980.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→