MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116986163 · doi:10.1002/alz70860_107614

Post‐TBI cognitive trajectories: Differences by sex/gender, cause, and severity

2025· article· en· W7116986163 on OpenAlexaff
D. Hanes, Sean A.P. Clouston

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionAssociation (psychology)Poison controlInterpersonal communicationInterpersonal relationshipInjury prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: While traumatic brain injury (TBI) is recognized as an important risk factor for cognitive health, most research has been conducted on military servicemembers and athletes, often postmortem-primarily (or exclusively) male populations with limited causes of TBI, access to healthcare and monitoring not typical of the general population. The generalizability of these studies, and the impact on TBI at the population level, remains unclear; and little research has been conducted on TBIs among the general population, including women, nor using non-postmortem methods. METHOD: Using TBI and cognition data from the Health and Retirement Study, this paper analyses longitudinal changes in cognition and dementia risk among participants who have experienced TBI after age 50, including differences by sex/gender, TBI cause, and severity. Cognition was measured using a 27-point scale and included immediate and delayed recall, numeracy, and orientation questions. For TBI, participants were asked a series of questions about whether they had had a traumatic brain injury, the date of the injury, cause of that injury, and various sequelae. A dummy variable was coded into having had a TBI or not, and variables were created to indicate the earliest and latest TBI each participant had. Sex/gender was gather in the initial wave and two options (male and female) were given. Multilevel regression was conducted with cognition as the outcome variable and including time since TBI, source of TBI, and sequelae count, as well as sex/gender. Demographic variables, including age, race/ethnicity, education, wealth, veteran status, and histories of homelessness and incarceration were also included. RESULT: In the fully adjusted model, years-since-TBI was statistically significantly associated with a decrease in cognition (b = -0.05, p = 0.008). Interpersonal violence as the cause of TBI was also negatively associated with cognition (b = -0.74, p = 0.004). Neither sex/gender nor TBI sequelae had a statistically significant association with cognition CONCLUSION: TBI may have long-lasting effects on cognitive health well after its occurrence, and these may be compounded when that injury is due to interpersonal violence. More research is needed to analyze the relationship between violence, TBI, and later-life cognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→